LCA Case Study - Sachet vs PET

Sustainability Research + Communication

End-to-End LCA Case Study: Sachet Water vs PET Bottled Water (Lagos)

This page explains the full project in one place: why we did it, how we calculated impacts, what we found, and what decisions it supports.

Cradle-to-grave comparative LCA with functional unit of 1 L consumed, deterministic + uncertainty outputs, sensitivity scenarios, and policy translation outputs.

Case locality: Lagos, Nigeria Functional unit: 1 L consumed Boundary: cradle-to-grave Audience: technical + non-technical

Who Is This For?

  • Policymakers and city agencies
  • Sustainability researchers
  • NGOs and communication teams
  • Students and learners

Climate Impact (GWP)

0.0425

kg CO2-eq/L (Sachet baseline)

Climate Impact (GWP)

0.0897

kg CO2-eq/L (PET baseline)

Water Depletion

12.4 vs 82.6

L of virtual water per 1 L delivered

Cumulative Energy

0.592 vs 1.912

MJ/L (Sachet vs PET)

Project Approach (End-to-End)

Transparent + Reproducible Workflow

1. Define

Set goal, audience, functional unit (1 L), and boundaries from raw materials to end-of-life.

2. Collect

Build inventory defaults and uncertainty ranges for packaging, energy, transport, and waste fate.

3. Model

Run deterministic LCA calculations for GWP, water depletion, and cumulative energy demand.

4. Test

Perform sensitivity and Monte Carlo-style uncertainty summaries to test robustness.

5. Translate

Convert outputs into policy and implementation recommendations.

System Boundary

What is included in this study from start to finish.

Foreground + background flows across cradle-to-grave boundary.

Raw material
Packaging production
Filling operations
Transport
Consumption
End-of-life

Core Assumptions (Lagos defaults)

Parameter Sachet PET
Packaging mass per FU6 g/L24 g/L
Filling energy0.02 kWh/L0.02 kWh/L
Transport distance40 km40 km
Recycling share5%15%
Mismanaged/open-burn share75%50%

Results, Tables, and Visual Evidence

Deterministic + Sensitivity + Uncertainty

A. Baseline Comparison

Sachet and PET values per 1 L consumed.

B. Sensitivity & Scenario Outcomes

Scenario Product GWP (kg CO2-eq/L) Interpretation

C. Hotspot Contribution (GWP share)

Where impacts are coming from within each life-cycle stage.

D. Uncertainty Snapshot (Monte Carlo summary)

Bars show mean values; error bars (95th - 5th range) shown as labels below.

Driver shares

Mean GWP contributions (per 1 L)

Sachet

Packaging: 34.9%

Filling energy: 45.3%

Transport: 0.1%

End-of-life: 19.7%

PET bottle

Packaging: 55.6%

Filling energy: 24.3%

Transport: 0.3%

End-of-life: 19.7%

Sensitivity visuals

Sensitivity scenarios: baseline vs scenario

GWP (PET baseline vs 50% recycling)

Water depletion (PET baseline vs 50% recycling)

Cumulative energy (Sachet baseline vs 20% lighter)

Interactive Decision Studio

Live Scenario Dashboard

Move sliders to see what changes policy and design choices can make.

Parametric scenario engine for recycling rate, packaging mass multiplier, and mismanaged sachet share.

15%

100% of baseline

75%

Sachet GWP

0.0000

kg CO2-eq/L

PET GWP

0.0000

kg CO2-eq/L

Sachet water + energy

0.0

(L + MJ) per L

PET water + energy

0.0

(L + MJ) per L

Live Comparison

Climate impact is shown separately so low GWP values remain visible.

Climate Impact (GWP)

Water and Energy

What This Means

Climate Winner

Resource Winner

Best Lever

    Project Artifacts and Deliverables

    All Key Files in This Repository

    Use this section as a guided map of the repository for reviewers and collaborators.

    Documentation and narrative outputs
    Data and model inputs
    Results and visuals
    Automation scripts

    Use Cases and Practical Application

    Policy Design

    Prioritize recycling systems and packaging standards with quantified impact signals.

    Producer Strategy

    Identify high-impact levers: lightweighting, recycled content, and end-of-life collection.

    Grant/Funder Communication

    Show transparent methods, uncertainty ranges, and actionable outcomes in one narrative.

    Public Education

    Translate technical lifecycle results into understandable trade-offs and choices.

    Glossary and Acronyms

    Term Full Meaning Simple Explanation
    LCALife Cycle AssessmentA method to measure environmental impacts from start to end of a product life.
    LCILife Cycle InventoryThe input data used in an LCA model (materials, energy, transport, waste).
    LCIALife Cycle Impact AssessmentThe step converting inventory data into impact indicators.
    GWPGlobal Warming PotentialClimate impact indicator, usually in kg CO2-equivalent.
    FUFunctional UnitThe common basis of comparison (here: 1 liter consumed).
    MJMegajouleA unit of energy.