Policy Brief — Environmental Comparison: Sachet Water vs PET Bottled Water (Lagos)

Prepared from the project: Full documentation

Executive summary

Per 1 L consumed (baseline assumptions):

Key hotspots

Packaging production dominates both water depletion and cumulative energy (≈ 80–95% of water footprint; ~35–55% of GWP depending on product). Filling energy and end-of-life are secondary but important for sachets due to high mismanagement rates.

Driver shares

See driver chart below (packaging / filling energy / transport / end-of-life):

driver shares

Policy-relevant sensitivities

Sensitivity visuals

sensitivity figures

Recommendations

  1. Prioritise interventions that reduce packaging mass and increase recycled content for both sachets and PET.
  2. Invest in collection and recycling infrastructure to capture post-consumer packaging and reduce open burning; targeted pilot in Lagos can shift large fractions of mismanaged plastic to recycling streams.
  3. Encourage design changes and extended producer responsibility for sachet-producing firms; small reductions in sachet mass compound to large regional benefits.
  4. Support local data collection (plant energy, real-world packaging mass, and waste fate) to refine LCA and target policies efficiently.

How to use this memo

Open this HTML file in a browser and save as Word (File → Save As → Webpage) or open in Word and save as .docx to produce an editable Word brief for stakeholders.


Generated from the project repository — see full documentation for detailed methods, data, and assumptions.